Team:TPHS SanDiego/Project

Revision as of 22:46, 20 June 2013 (view source)

Mokhshan (Talk | contribs)

← Older edit

Latest revision as of 23:21, 21 June 2013 (view source)

Biolingual (Talk | contribs)

(12 intermediate revisions not shown)

Line 4:

-

+

</map>

Line 43:

-

<p style="font-family:Georgia;color:black;font-size:16px;">Our project focuses on promoter engineering. Our goal is to characterize a set of promoters (of our design) by moving the repressor and/or activator binding sites with respect to the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter. Ideally, we would like to show that by moving an activator binding site it can become a repressor and that by moving a repressor binding site it may become either irrelevant to transcription rate or even boost it. We also want to see if there is a steep decline in repressor/activator function as the binding site move along the promoter or if it is a gradual/linear change. We believe this project could have application to genetic circuits by allowing a single protein to either activate or repress a promoter depending on where the binding sites are placed on the promoter.</p>

+

+

</p>

<p>

Line 50:

Line 52:

</p>

-

~~<center>~~

-

-

+

+

</html>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <map name="igemmap">
-   <area  shape="circle" coords="480,40,40" alt="Mercury" href="https://2011.igem.org" onfocus="this.blur()" />
+   <area  shape="circle" coords="480,40,40" alt="Mercury" href="https://2013hs.igem.org" onfocus="this.blur()" />
 </map>
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 <div class="col12-2" >
 <div align="justify">
-<p style="font-family:Georgia;color:black;font-size:16px;">Our project focuses on promoter engineering. Our goal is to characterize a set of promoters (of our design) by moving the repressor and/or activator binding sites with respect to the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter. Ideally, we would like to show that by moving an activator binding site it can become a repressor and that by moving a repressor binding site it may become either irrelevant to transcription rate or even boost it. We also want to see if there is a steep decline in repressor/activator function as the binding site move along the promoter or if it is a gradual/linear change. We believe this project could have application to genetic circuits by allowing a single protein to either activate or repress a promoter depending on where the binding sites are placed on the promoter.</p>
+<p style="font-family:Georgia;color:black;font-size:16px;">
+</p>
 <p>
 &nbsp;
@@ Line 50: / Line 52: @@
 &nbsp;
 </p>
-<center>
-<iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/18V3cPgfWJIS7meO2SBBTGxSG1RrKxYvsg_Pxw9hB-2Q/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="1440" height="1109" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe></center>
-<div class="row-end" ></div>
+<center>
+<iframe src="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1epg-_5lpwccgvIzR7I_abmn-gJ08GCMvlULQiOUBI_A/pub?embedded=true" width="875" height="875" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe></center><div class="row-end" ></div></center>
 </html>

From 2013hs.igem.org

Latest revision as of 23:21, 21 June 2013