Team:Lambert GA/safety
From 2013hs.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Janak10Joshi (Talk | contribs) |
Janak10Joshi (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
If the project goes according to plan, there is no risk to the environment or the general public. There is a slight risk to team members due to the use of ethidium bromide when running gel electrophoresis. Therefore, we follow all safety procedures very carefully. For example, team members change their gloves after using anything at the ethidium bromide workstation. All of our team members have recieved biosafety training at Lambert High School and have taken a safety test. Additionally, several members of the team have completed Right to Know, General Lab Safety, Biohazard training and Recombinant DNA Safety Training offered by Georgia Institute of Technology. | If the project goes according to plan, there is no risk to the environment or the general public. There is a slight risk to team members due to the use of ethidium bromide when running gel electrophoresis. Therefore, we follow all safety procedures very carefully. For example, team members change their gloves after using anything at the ethidium bromide workstation. All of our team members have recieved biosafety training at Lambert High School and have taken a safety test. Additionally, several members of the team have completed Right to Know, General Lab Safety, Biohazard training and Recombinant DNA Safety Training offered by Georgia Institute of Technology. | ||
- | If our contamination procedures go wrong, it will pose no threat to the environment because all of our bacteria is safe. | + | If our contamination procedures go wrong, it will pose no threat to the environment because all of our bacteria is safe. All waste was disposed of through proper biohazard safety protocols, including sterilizing, using the autoclave, and cleaning with bleach and ethanol. We keep samples under lock and key. |
+ | |||
- | |||
- | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 77: | Line 76: | ||
No. None of the BioBricks that we used this year raise any safety issues. | No. None of the BioBricks that we used this year raise any safety issues. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
---- | ---- | ||
<h>====3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? ==== </h> | <h>====3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? ==== </h> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
+ | We are working with Principal Investigator Dr. Mark Styczyinski, and our project is under review by the Georgia Tech biosafety review board. They are in favor of it. Our project is in compliance with national regulations and university requirements. | ||
Line 101: | Line 88: | ||
<h>====4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? ==== </h> | <h>====4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? ==== </h> | ||
- | + | Have all Biobricks contain a potential knockout device. | |
- | + |
Revision as of 18:06, 12 June 2013