Team:The Agency Escondido/notebook

From 2013hs.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 347: Line 347:
<p>Vansh Singh and Andrew Buss accompanied Andrew Segina to a local university to use a nanodrop machine to quantify the DNA samples from 4/18. The readings on all samples were outside of the range of the machine - either our samples were too concentrated or too dilute, or impurities were introduced. Supplies for agarose gel runs are on order - we will verify that we have any DNA fragments of the correct length when the supplies arrive.</p>
<p>Vansh Singh and Andrew Buss accompanied Andrew Segina to a local university to use a nanodrop machine to quantify the DNA samples from 4/18. The readings on all samples were outside of the range of the machine - either our samples were too concentrated or too dilute, or impurities were introduced. Supplies for agarose gel runs are on order - we will verify that we have any DNA fragments of the correct length when the supplies arrive.</p>
<h2>April 24</h2>
<h2>April 24</h2>
-
<p>Vansh Singh, Evan Santos, Blaise Devalasco, Andrew Buss, and Grant Hassinger prepared LB broth according to <a href = "http://casp.agency-stem.org/media/G13-LP0003-32.pdf">revision 32 of LB liquid</a>.<p>
+
 
 +
<p>Our competent cells arrived from NEB. While we originally planned to begin transformation today, continued difficulties with the centrifuge occupied our efforts. One of six tubes was retained in dry ice inside a styrofoam ice box inside the -20 C freezer for transformation the next day - the other five were taken to a local university for storage at -80 C. </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Andrew Buss prepared LB broth according to <a href = "http://casp.agency-stem.org/media/G13-LP0003-14.pdf">revision 34 of our LB broth protocol</a>.<p>
 +
<!-- each person below should write their own statements, including the amount of media produced. E.g. Grant J produced 150 mL, while Andrew prepared 100 mL -->
 +
 
 +
<p style="text-decoration:line-through;">Vansh Singh, Evan Santos, Blaise Devalasco, Andrew Buss, and Grant Hassinger prepared LB broth according to <a href = "http://casp.agency-stem.org/media/G13-LP0003-32.pdf">revision 32 of LB liquid</a>.<p>
 +
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
     </div>
     </div>
</html>
</html>

Revision as of 06:27, 25 April 2013

April 9

Andrew Buss prepared 120 mL of LB broth

April 10

Andrew Buss prepared two LB plates without antibiotics, using our LB plate protocol, rev 72.

Andrew Segina and Vansh Singh inoculated two ampicillin/kanamycin LB plates with E. coli containing Parts A and B from the 3A assembly kit

Andrew Buss inoculated an SOB plate with NEB10 competent E. coli

April 11

Andrew Segina inoculated an SOB plate with NEB10 competent E. coli

The plates previously inoculated with E. coli with parts A and B do not show visible growth

Andrew Segina prepared 1 L of YPD broth without dextrose

April 12

Andrew Buss inspected plates at 8:15 AM. Both NEB10 plates showed visible growth. Neither plate with Part A or B displayed growth.

Andrew Buss prepared four YPD plates from the 1L stock and mixed 4 grams of table sugar before pouring

Andrew Buss inoculated two LB tubes each with E. coli with parts A and B directly from the agar stabs included in the 3A assembly kit. The intention was to diagnose the lack of growth on the A and B plates over two days.

Andrew Buss inspected plates again around 1:00 PM. NEB10 plates showed additional growth, and the plate with Part A contained visible colonies. The plate with Part B did not show growth, however.

Grant Hassinger mixed 100 mL of LB broth and began an autoclave cycle with the media

Vansh Singh inoculated a tube of ampicillin/kanamycin LB broth from the 3A assembly kit with a colony from the Part A plate

Vansh Singh inspected Part B plate at 10:20pm. Part B plate showed visible growth.

Vansh Singh inoculated a tube of ampicillin/kanamycin LB broth from the 3A assembly kit with a colony from the Part B plate

Vansh Singh prepared a tube of ampicillin/kanamycin LB broth from the 3A assembly kit without inoculation. The tube was placed into the refrigerator

Andrew Buss inoculated a tube of LB broth with a colony from the NEB10 plate from April 10

April 13 labeled media

Andrew SeginaLB platePart A from kitAmpicillin, kanamycin
Andrew SeginaLB platePart B from kitAmpicillin, kanamycin
Andrew BussSOB plateNEB 10 from kit
Andrew SeginaSOB plateNEB 10 from kit
Andrew BussLB tubePart A from kitIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tube x2Part A from kitIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tube x2Part B from kitIncubating in dry bath
Vansh SinghLB tubePart A from 4/10 plateIncubating in dry bath
Vansh SinghLB tubePart B from 4/10 plateIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tubeNEB 10 from 4/10 SOB plateIncubating in dry bath

April 13 available media

Andrew Segina800 mL YPDLacks dextrose
Andrew Buss4 YPD plates
Andrew Buss2 LB plates
Andrew Segina8 LB plates
Andrew Buss~10mL LB tubeIn dry bath for comparison
Andrew Buss~40mL LB broth
Vansh Singh~5mL LB brothAmpicillin, kanamycin
Grant Hassinger100mL LB broth

April 16

Our refrigerated centrifuge arrived, removing the final obstacle to 3A assembly. However, the centrifuge did not consistently power up. This issue was initially ascribed to a faulty fuse.

Vansh Singh performed DNA Miniprep for self grown colonies as per the iGEM 3A Assembly Kit

April 17

Upon closer inspection of the centrifuge, it became evident that it was in fact missing a fuse. When a 20A fuse was installed, the centrifuge powered up normally. Several test runs indicated temperature control in the range of -10 to 30 degrees C, and an effective maximum centrifuge speed of 2500 RPM (despite a dial that can be turned to 6,000 RPM).

Vansh Singh transferred DNA of Part A, Part B, and NEB10 colonies to Ependorfs to find concentration of DNA

Andrew Buss prepared 100 mL of LB broth using revision 14 of our LB broth protocol. However, autoclaving was deferred until a larger batch of material needed autoclaving.

Andrew Buss inoculated two tubes of LB broth with E. coli containing Part A and Part B from the 4/10 plates to provide additional miniprep material for the following day. Due to the scarcity of ampicillin/kanamycin media (antibiotics to be ordered soon), these were cultured without antibiotics.

Evan Santos and Grant Hassinger streaked 3 agar plates with 3 different yeast samples for colonial development.

April 18

The tubes containing Part A and Part B had not displayed visible growth from the night before. However, the tubes inoculated on 4/12 displayed growth.

Andrew Buss extracted plasmid DNA containing Part A and Part B from the cells in the 4/12 tubes using the 3A assembly kit miniprep protocol. RNAse 1 was accidentally omitted from the P1 buffer, so it will need to be introduced before transformation. The two resulting samples were placed in the freezer, labeled "ATB A" and "ATB B". Halfway through the process, the non-refrigerated microcentrifuge was relocated to the interior of our refrigerator, because its operation generates enough heat to risk damaging the DNA samples.

Before restriction can proceed with any of our DNA fragments, the concentration of DNA in the samples must be measured. Our lab does not own a nanodrop machine, so Andrew Segina will use one at a local university to perform the measurement.

When the centrifuge was moved, it did not power up. After the purchase of a replacement fuse, the centrifuge's inconsistent operation was revealed as a consequence of an internally loose power cable. Depending on the orientation of the cable, the centrifuge may not turn on.

Vansh Singh researched GFP and RFP genes for project.

Andrew Buss inoculated three LB tubes and one LB plate with NEB10 cells from the 4/10 plate in preparation for transformation the following day.

April 19

All three NEB10 tubes from 4/18 showed significant growth. The plate from 4/18 showed faint streaks but no isolated colonies.

Quantification of the miniprepped DNA samples from the 18th has been postponed to Monday 4/22. Andrew Buss and Vansh Singh chose to continue with the 3A protocol in the interim, beginning with the restriction of the supplied DNA samples.

Andrew Buss completed restriction digest of all four samples of DNA from the 3A assembly kit: Part A, Part B, pSB1C3 plasmid backbone, and RFP control. However, 22.5 uL of distilled water was pipetted into the RFP restriction reaction, as in the other reactions, rather than the 17.5 uL specifically prescribed for the RFP tube.

Vansh Singh completed Restriction Digest of DNA from kit as per iGEM 3A Assembly kit

Andrew Buss completed ligation of the digests of Parts A and B, plus the plasmid backbone, from the earlier restriction.

April 20

Andrew Buss had planned to perform transformation. The link to the competent cell production protocol was broken, so it was incorrectly assumed that the transformation protocol had been revised to include the competent cell production. The protocol was discovered in the printed copies distributed with the 3A assembly kit, and required large centrifuge tubes and CCMB80 buffer, which our lab lacks. These are to be ordered soon, but in order to expedite transformation, a New England Biolabs order for competent cells is also to be placed.

The 4/18 NEB10 plate showed uniform growth along the streaks, rather than increasingly isolated colonies along the streak. Andrew Buss recalls that he did not flip the inoculating loop after performing the initial inoculation but before streaking, an error that was responsible for the unusual growth.

Andrew Buss inoculated a second LB plate with a section of NEB10 cells from the 4/18 NEB10 plate.

April 20 labeled media

Andrew SeginaLB platePart A from kitAmpicillin, kanamycinIn refrigerator
Andrew SeginaLB platePart B from kitAmpicillin, kanamycinIn refrigerator
Andrew BussSOB plateNEB 10 from kitIn refrigerator
Andrew SeginaSOB plateNEB 10 from kitIn refrigerator
Andrew BussLB tubePart A from kitIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tubePart B from kitIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tubePart A from 4/10 plateIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tubePart B from 4/10 plateIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB tube x3NEB 10 from 4/10 SOB plateIncubating in dry bath
Andrew BussLB plateNEB 10 from 4/10 SOB plateIncubating
Andrew BussLB plateNEB 10 from 4/18 NEB 10 plateIncubating

April 20 available media

Andrew Segina800 mL YPDLacks dextrose
Andrew Segina8 LB plates
Andrew Buss~5mL LB broth
Vansh Singh~5mL LB brothAmpicillin, kanamycin
Grant Hassinger100mL LB broth
Grant Hassinger100mL LB broth

April 23

Andrew Buss's LB broth from April 17 was not autoclaved because there were no other autoclave operations with which to batch it. The broth was contaminated in the intervening time and is not usable. In the future, media will be autoclaved immediately after mixing.

Vansh Singh performed DNA Ligation on the linearized plasmid Backbone of pSBCI3, and DNA parts of Part A and Part B according to revision 18 of Ligation.

Grant Hassinger reinoculated one LB tube with E. coli with parts B from Andrew Buss's

Vansh Singh and Andrew Buss accompanied Andrew Segina to a local university to use a nanodrop machine to quantify the DNA samples from 4/18. The readings on all samples were outside of the range of the machine - either our samples were too concentrated or too dilute, or impurities were introduced. Supplies for agarose gel runs are on order - we will verify that we have any DNA fragments of the correct length when the supplies arrive.

April 24

Our competent cells arrived from NEB. While we originally planned to begin transformation today, continued difficulties with the centrifuge occupied our efforts. One of six tubes was retained in dry ice inside a styrofoam ice box inside the -20 C freezer for transformation the next day - the other five were taken to a local university for storage at -80 C.

Andrew Buss prepared LB broth according to revision 34 of our LB broth protocol.

Vansh Singh, Evan Santos, Blaise Devalasco, Andrew Buss, and Grant Hassinger prepared LB broth according to revision 32 of LB liquid.